Has there ever been another fictional movie about
assassinating a real, living ruler? I’m guessing so. But The Interview managed to find itself in a perfect storm of media
hype thanks to the Sony hacks and North Korea’s dictator, Kim Jong-un,
responding so negatively (and threateningly) to the idea of the film. Then
again, it’s about his purported
assassination, so I can certainly understand his vexation. But is it wrong to
make a movie like this, since everything we hear about Kim Jong-un (and his
father, Kim Jong-il before him) is so horrible? It does feel a bit
wrong-headed, if only because of the real tragedy that exists for the oppressed
millions living in North Korea, where a strong propaganda machine controls all
information, and where there is apparently mass starvation. At least in movies
like Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained, the bad guys are so
far removed from us in the present—and so vilified—rightly—in our minds—that
the horrors perpetrated against them in the movie don’t feel horrific, just
funny and even deserved. Perhaps The
Interview is ahead of its time. But I’m doubtful it will be remembered as a
great comedy, especially when it’s so pickled in its own insipid view of the
world.
At any rate, with all the hoopla surrounding the tumultuous
release of The Interview, it’s
perhaps ironic—and more than a bit disappointing—that the movie isn’t very
good. As a comedy, it delivers almost no laughs. (And all of them are squeezed
into the film’s trailer.) The film may actually work better as a bad drama
trying to understand the mind and the world of an eccentric dictator whose
imprisoned people have been fooled into thinking he’s a god. But regardless,
there’s little to recommend in The
Interview.
James Franco spends most of the film trying really hard to
be funny by hamming it up, but his mugging isn’t charming. It’s the bad
over-acting of a comic performer whose directors (Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg)
don’t have the sense to reign him in. Throughout the film, which runs nearly
two hours (and could have easily been thirty minutes shorter), I felt strongly
that the makers of it were convinced everything they were doing was
hysterically funny.
Franco plays Dave Skylark, the host of a popular
entertainment television show that features segments like Rob Lowe revealing
his baldness and Eminem unceremoniously coming out on the air. Seth Rogen plays
Dave’s producer and best friend, who becomes convinced that the show needs to
focus on more important subject matter. When the pair discovers that North
Korea’s dictator, 31-year-old Kim Jong-un, is an avid fan of the show, they
decide that interviewing the infamous despot will catapult them into a more
respectable, serious level of TV journalism. But the CIA has other plans for them,
namely to assassinate Kim Jong-un during their stay in the country’s capital,
Pyongyang.
Inept assassins can be funny. The plot of The Interview could almost be that of a
Marx Brothers movie. James Franco and Seth Rogen try very hard as those inept assassins, but there’s not much fun to be
had in their many botched attempts at killing Kim Jong-un. The gags must have
seemed funny in the abstract, but the movie is so enamored of its premise that
it doesn’t feel the need to do anything more than let that premise play itself
out. There’s no invention in the humor, only the dull satisfaction of the
performers and the writers who think they’re doing something funny. (Franco
acts like a child and makes idiotic decisions that frustrate their plans over
and over again; Rogen generally suffers the consequences, like when he’s forced
to insert a metallic capsule into his rectum to hide a poison agent from some
of Kim Jong-un’s goons.) The jokes are repeatedly delusional, content to
recycle an antiquated notion of Asian culture and an arrogant, ignorant
nostalgia for Asian stereotypes. (As when James Franco says, “Koniwicha” to
North Koreans as he alights from his plane.) Even those feeble gags might have
been funny if they had been written and acted out with any imagination.
Perhaps Sony didn’t orchestrate the hack that led to The Interview’s canceled—and then marginally
un-canceled—premiere. But the free publicity they’ve gotten out of this event
will likely help make up for a loss in revenue. (And the film is sure to do
well as an online rental via Youtube and Google Play.) And it has, strangely
enough, secured a weird little spot in cinema history for a markedly
forgettable movie.
With Randall Park, who gives the film’s most authentic and
heartfelt performance as Kim Jong-un himself; Lizzy Caplan as a CIA agent
(whose chest is ogled by the camera in one of the film’s classiest moments),
and Diana Bang as Sook, one of Kim Jong-un’s propaganda ministers, with whom
Rogen’s character falls in love. (Her hairdo, which looks like a soft roll of
black charcoal, is somehow perfect, especially when she’s holding a
vintage-looking machine gun and firing away.) Written by Dan Sterling.
No comments:
Post a Comment