Although there are moments when This Is Where I Leave You is charming,
funny, interesting, even poignant, it’s generally a mess. In fact the movie is such a
mess that it's tempting to think that the makers confused narrative
drama with dramatic structure, and therefore found it perfectly natural to let the structure be as loose as everything else in the movie. There are insane things that happen in this
movie, and they seem to be happening for the sheer insanity of it. It’s about
four adult siblings who come together after the death of their father. The
matriarch—played by Jane Fonda—gathers them together in her large New England
home for Shiva, the seven-day period in the Jewish faith during which family
members officially mourn the passing of a loved one.
The film has an attractive cast: Jason
Bateman, Tina Fey, Adam Driver, Rose Byrne, Corey Stoll, Connie Britton,
Timothy Olyphant, Dax Shepard, Ben Schwartz, and of course the great Jane
Fonda. But in order to have so many big names and big stars, you need a lot of
big parts. And that’s probably where This
Is Where I Leave You loses its way. It has too many characters, all of whom
are required to have multiple scenes of inner-crises spilling out into the
open.
For instance, Jason Bateman’s character,
Judd, who walks in on his wife and his boss during a vigorous round of
love-making in his own bed. (The wife later finds out she’s pregnant, but that
it’s Judd’s baby, not the boss’s.) Wendy (Fey) is the bossy big sister who
possesses a sometimes charming, sometimes grating, know-it-all quality. She too
has problems: namely a husband who’s too busy with work to pay attention to his
wife and children. Paul (Stoll) is the responsible eldest sibling. He and his
wife Anne (Kathryn Hahn) are having trouble conceiving. And then there’s Philip
(Driver), the baby sibling who never grew up. The actors are adept enough to
make it work at least half the time, but these are pretty tried-and-true
character types torn right out of the pages of a sitcom script.
That’s another problem. This is a sitcom comedy-drama movie, and
it represents an increasingly distinct genre of films that typically have mixed
results. They do give traditionally comedic actors a chance to cry on screen
and look puffy and unattractive. And, like any well-behaved sitcom, the serious
moments are always punctuated with something funny. It’s not wrong to do that,
but it also seems sort of cheap to stifle every dramatic moment with an easy
laugh (frequently derived from Jane Fonda’s enormous breast implants, which
trigger intense anxiety in all of her children, especially as she presses their
faces against her plastic bosoms while consoling them, as she is wont to do).
Then again, these dramatic moments aren’t so important or revealing or original
that they can’t be improved with a little comedy.
Actually, the saving grace in this film is
the dippy character played by Rose Byrne. She’s a girl from Judd’s past, and
their relationship is rekindled in the usual ways you expect from this kind of
thing: boy meets girl, boy remembers girl from adolescent years, boy and girl
have good memories of each other, boy shows up at girl’s work—a skating
rink—where they skate and talk while Cyndi Lauper’s “Time After Time” spills
over them from the speakers above. It’s not a particularly original romance,
but it’s sort of enchanting to see Jason Bateman and Rose Byrne just hanging
out, especially when the rest of the movie feels like a competition to see how
many problems can be crammed into two hours of film.
This
Is Where I Leave You isn’t really offensive in its quest to be the latest dramedy
(or a light-hearted version of August
Osage County), but it is disappointing. The director, Shawn Levy, and the
screenwriter, Jonathan Tropper (who adapted his own novel), seem to be
clutching at fragments of two different genres and then cramming them onto the
same canvas. It helps if you’re a fan of Jason Bateman and Tina Fey, although
it may not help to see them wasted in middling material. But Bateman carries
the film well, and Fey is capable of real pathos. It’s perhaps most depressing
to see Jane Fonda turning such tricks in a movie theater. She’s funny, but she
hardly gets to do anything that isn’t surface-level, lowest common denominator
humor.
Adam Driver has probably the most appealing
part, but then that makes sense: he’s the stereotypical fun-loving youngest
sibling, the one who’s also a perpetual screw-up. And of course, he’s vested
with lots of unintentional bits of wisdom, all of them obliviously aimed at
teaching the other siblings that their lives are just as messy as his. But if
the film weren’t so careful in its adherence to certain character types, it
might be funnier, more inventive. As it is, it’s a predictable, sometimes even
boring, family drama that’s bolstered by the appeal of its considerable talent.
No comments:
Post a Comment