How well do we really know
the people we live with? What little disappointments or changes, what dashed
hopes buried within, turn into something big, something dangerous, and when
does that terrifying transformation begin? David Fincher’s latest film, Gone Girl, which was adapted to the
screen by Gillian Flynn from her novel, peers into the darkness of the glass,
into the inner-lives of two people living side by side as perfect strangers to
each other.
Gone Girl
has all the trappings of the great “novel of sensation,” Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White, which was published
in 1860 to something like an exhilarated obsession among the reading public. It
was all the rage in Victorian London--there was even Woman in White perfume-- and became something of a touchstone for
the mystery novel. Collins would later write what is considered the first
English detective novel (The Moonstone)
and we can trace every modern murder mystery in literature and film to these
two seminal works. The Woman in White (and
all the imitations that followed it) had wonderfully, delectably sinister ingredients
like murder and madness and forged wills and people being held prisoner by
their own relatives. Collins had tapped into the inner-workings of the British
social sphere and shown it for all the darkness it contained (or could contain
under the right circumstances), and right at a time when social issues such as
murder and divorce were being widely publicized by the increasingly popular
newspapers to the increasingly literate populace. (This was also right around
the time that an official police force was established.)
In its own way, the film
adaptation of Gone Girl is a piece of
sensation fiction, and moreover, a savvy commentary on the sensationalism that
our current news media dishes out with giddy, morbid fervor. Gone Girl is ostensibly about a man named Nick Dunne (played by Ben
Affleck) whose wife Amy (played by Rosamund Pike) disappears without a trace
from their quiet suburban Missouri home one perfectly un-sinister morning.
Naturally, Nick becomes the prime suspect when investigators thoroughly search
the house and find suspicious things like blood spatter, a recent fire in the
fireplace (in July), and signs of struggle that appear to have been staged. Soon
the media waltzes in and pounces on Nick, questioning his apparent non-grief,
diagnosing him as a sociopath, and turning him into the most hated man of the
hour.
But that’s just the
beginning.
The movie interacts with
the missing wife in flashback. We see the two of them meet. In that scene the
dialogue is maddeningly difficult to discern. But the music and the camera are
in sync and the exchange between Affleck and Pike is lovely. Their chemistry is
so good that you find yourself thinking, “How could this have happened? When
was the day that he suddenly became able to kill
her?” There’s a wistful feeling about those early years in their relationship,
and the camera feeds it to us. Their conversations are of two charming,
intelligent people, perhaps too self-aware for their own good. When they both
purchase the same gift for each other for their anniversary, Pike’s character
jokingly mocks them for being too cute. They comment on their own lives as
though they were on camera, perhaps some inane reality show but one featuring
clever people saying witty things. Many of those flashback scenes involve Pike
writing in her diary, and her style is personal, funny, again very self-aware.
She writes in an offhand way so as not to be accused of being overly
sentimental or unaware. And when the problems start—after two layoffs and a
dying parent happen in rapid succession—they become obsessed with not resorting
to any of the common defense mechanisms of struggling married couples. “We’re
not going to be the couple that has a baby to save the marriage,” they keep
telling each other (and themselves).
David Fincher should have
earned our respect as a filmmaker by now. His 2007 Zodiac may be the great film of the previous decade. (At the very
least, it’s in the top five.) And more recently, Fincher impressed with both
the Facebook biopic The Social Network
and the thrilling American version of The
Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. So we should expect nothing less than good
work from him (and from Gillian Flynn, who deserves so much credit for spinning
such a fascinating, disturbing, riveting story.) In the previews, Gone Girl is packaged as an upscale
version of a Law and Order episode.
And the film wants you to see the Scott Peterson resemblance in Ben Affleck’s
character and let your mind do the rest. But there’s much more to Gone Girl than any previews might
suggest. There will be no spoilers here. This is too good a movie to ruin. The
pleasures of this kind of well-crafted potboiler are so rare in movies these
days, that anytime we do get something this good, it feels almost miraculous.
Ben Affleck may have the
hardest role in this film. His character is quite tricky: he’s an imperfect man
to be sure, possibly a truly evil man, and Affleck manages a delicate balancing
act. When he goes before the press (and the public), people read his inability
to display credible signs of grief as a big guilty sign. (It’s a startling
commentary on how news stories are disseminated and how public opinion can be
shaped—quite arbitrarily—by appearances.) Yet we find ourselves torn between
wanting to crucify him and wanting to save him from his own inability to package
himself in an appealing way. Indeed, so much of what we see in Gone Girl is reflected through the eyes
of people or events that are open to interpretation. That is where once again
this film truly echoes those novels of old, many of which were organized as a
series of documents (letters, diary entries, newspaper articles, police
reports, etc), organized (and possibly edited) by a supposedly objective party.
Who is truly reliable? Is
the media really trustworthy in its alleged pursuit of truth? Or is it simply
chasing a story that it invents in the process? Gone Girl adeptly aims its arrows at this very process of taking an
ongoing story and turning it into the trashiest kind of grisly entertainment,
heightened by a network news talk show host named Ellen Abbott (played
masterfully by Missi Pyle) who goes after Nick with the boldness of a shark and
worries little about actual tangible evidence.
Kim Dickens plays the
unwavering detective, a scrappy, smart, modern-day version of the Sergeant Cuff
in Wilkie Collins’s The Moonstone.
Dickens gives her a sense of humor and a sense of proportion: She seems to be
the only one who’s interested in looking at facts. Tyler Perry is dead-on as
Nick’s lawyer, Tanner Bolt, who’s notorious for defending the obviously guilty
husbands of the world, and Carrie Coon delivers an at times stunning
performance as Nick’s sister Margo, the only one who believes in Nick’s
innocence. Because of her somewhat thankless role as Nick’s protector and
champion, she may not get the credit she deserves for her fine work. But then,
everyone in this movie is good.
And Rosamund Pike seals
the fate of this film with her performance. As we delve into this couple’s
complicated relationship, we begin to see new sides to Amy. Pike is an actress
who hasn’t gotten the notice she deserves, despite a number of good
performances, including her part in 2009’s An
Education. She is a true chameleon as an actress: by turns glamorous and
cool, sexy, smart, manipulative, pathetic. In parts of the film she looks like
a movie star, and in others, like someone who walked out of a Flannery O’Connor
short story: a forlorn, dowdy nobody with a scar or a limp or some other
classic O’Connor deformity.
Gone Girl
leaves you with questions. The film is certainly satisfying, but its characters
are complex enough, its plot bizarre enough (yet somehow truthful too), that
you can’t help but feel obsessively curious about every minute detail. Fincher
is a director who successfully layers his movies with the minutia of human
existence without losing sight of the grander story being told. And the details
always add to the story. His movies have, since Zodiac at least, almost always felt in touch with the human
emotions and inner-conflicts at work under the surface. There’s nothing cheap
or obvious about Gone Girl, and while
the many lurid revelations of this film’s plot may at times feel overwhelming,
it’s hard not to be taken in by such a fascinating, thrilling piece of
entertainment. It leaves you thinking, “Is anyone really safe?” Indeed, the
problems that this movie explores and the questions it asks may be answered,
but never totally understood, never completely solved. Do we really know
another human heart? We fear the interiority of each other because it puts us on
the outside, completely void of control, and Gone Girl is ultimately about the politics of control. Who gets to
tell the story? And how do you know whom to believe?
With Neil Patrick Harris,
Patrick Fugit, Casey Wilson, Sela Ward, Lisa Banes, David Clennon, and Scoot
McNairy. Music by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross. Cinematography by Jeff
Cronenweth.
No comments:
Post a Comment